If ‘AMPDevicesAgent’ is already listed in the box, go to step 9.
#Hstracker blue numbers plus#
Click the plus (+) button at the bottom-left corner of the window.#Hstracker wants to use your confidential information plus# Click the blue Add button at the bottom-right of the window. This adds AMPDevicesAgent to the list of applications allowed to access the iOS backup keychain item. Repeat with any other iOS backup items in the list.ĪMPDevicesAgent high CPU up to 100% of total or 200% in Activity Monitor can be caused by an iOS sync in progress. This might not be immediately apparent, since synchronisation with an iPhone can happen in the background, wirelessly. This is perfectly normal and AMPDevicesAgent CPU will decrease after the sync or backup has concluded.
You can either disable automatic synchronisation always or just disable wireless background sync. See the next section for detailed instructions. Remove iPhone from Finder sidebarĬhoose the device in the sidebar and untick ‘Show this iPhone when on Wi-Fi’. This will hide the device in the sidebar when not connected to your computer over USB: when the device is on the same Wi-Fi network as your Mac.
#Hstracker wants to use your confidential information download#.#Hstracker wants to use your confidential information plus#.#Hstracker wants to use your confidential information password#.#Hstracker wants to use your confidential information update#.I am also not sure HS tracker is the best source of data to use as I said since I dont know where and how they pull their numbers. To be honest I this point I am not trusting anything numbers wise you say as you have proven you are incapable of doing basic assessments of common situations and fallacies. I will enjoy pointing this out to you later this week when Bliz hopefully announces the nerfs to mage and lock. Therefore the sample size discrepancy is leading to your erroneous interpretation.Īgain I know math is hard for you but once more you are incorrect. Warlocks are less popular because the lynchpin card needed is a newly released legendary and thus not a lot of people have it. The fact that the #3s can be “back loaded” is a type of statistical bias. Not necessarily, because if you let RNG #1 run 50 more times you might have gotten 40 more #3s and thus would have a 50% average in the end. You run RNG #1 50 times and you get the #3 10 out of 50 times (20% since math is hard for you). You run RNG #1 100 times and you get the #3 50 times. Lets say you have 2 RNGs that spit out the #3 50% of the time People don’t really understand statistics that well. Mage has a 49% win rate, Warlock 53%, Paladin 55% and Hunter a ridiculous 59%. Read the mountains of stats proving you wrong there. You have an 8th grade education at best, as the high school I went to would’ve failed me for such ignorance behavior. You ignore evidence, claims others do, post nothing it refute, but claim the opposite. Like almost his entire post history is in that thread, and a good 10 people repeatedly posted evidence refuting his claims, and like you he just kept doubling down on his BS.Įventually he posted Cherry Picked “evidence,” that was then proven to be exactly that, cherry picked to (sortof but not really) support his claim while ignoring the mountains that refuted it. There’s another dude just like you named Deadsy that made similar BS claims. Go to the thread titled Robes of protection? Calling BS, just wait for nerfs. Your wild claims are not a refute of anything they are just that, your wild claims and personal annecdotal headcannon. Dude, what is with people with less then 50 post apparently unable to post basic High-School level proofs and yet somehow convince themselves they refuted something they didn’t even remotely refute.
0 kommentar(er)
